Well not quite 2 weeks....
But there was a lot packed into those 11 days - a crazy big Irish wedding, amazing ancient sights and scenery, and a heck of a lot of good food, people, and beer. Oh yeah... and the XT-10 & XT-1 with the new Firmware 4.0 plus a few rather nice pieces of FujiFilm glass.
After many months of dreaming about this big trip and even bigger wedding in Ireland, the time finally came. The lead up to the trip and shooting said wedding was made even better with the arrival of the XT-10 and the new firmware 4.0 update that proved the XT-10 to be a formidable force in 'budget' mirrorless cameras, and breathed new life into the XT-1, even though it didn't really need it.
For this trip, my wife and I were primarily hired to shoot a wedding on the west coast of Ireland in the incredibly picturesque town of Dingle. Jaw-dropping would be an understatement. Of course, it would be a pity to not see more of a country than just one place and Ireland is a place of wonder and awe. We packed a rather nice bit of kit for this one, including the fresh and sharp Fujinon XF16 and XT-10.
So how about that XT-10?
Well, what can I say? It's a damn fine camera and a perfect match for the XT-1 for shooting weddings in a discrete and professional manner. I actually ended up using the XT-10 for most of the trip because of its compact size and to give it a fair run for its money. Did it impress me just like almost every Fuji product I've used before it? Absolutely!
For the wedding I shot with the XT-1 over my shoulder with the XF56 and had the XT-10 on a holster with the XF16. A light-weight combo that after 16 hours of shooting did not leave me sore, fatigued or in any state of pain. The only ailment was the tiredness that was to be expected from shooting a day that long! I also got to experience the true value of the SP-1 Instax printer and how integral it is for creating a truly memorable wedding photography service that leave clients overjoyed on their big day! Alas, I cannot share their photos just yet.
XT-10 or X100?
Something that's fairly obvious and should be considered by anyone buying into the Fujifilm X-series is the power in a small package with the XT-10. Shortly after the announcement of the XT-10, I did the usual level of research regarding its specs, size and reported performance, and well, it's almost the same size as the X100 series but does a heck of a lot more! So, I sold off my X100s and jumped on the XT-10 the day after it was available in Australia. I also made a point of picking up the XF27 so I had a very pocketable and discrete option for shooting streets and other settings. Do I miss the X100? Absolutely! Does the XT-10 rock! Yes! I will probably get back into the X100 game when they announce their next model. Until then, the equally discrete and lightweight XT-10 paired with the XT-1 will continue to suit my needs appropriately. More on the XT-10 down the page.
And what about the XF16? It's fair to say that it got a good work out, and yet again, the weather sealing was tested and passed wonderfully when paired with the XT-1. Irish summers aren't particularly summery at times, so long exposure shots with the XT-1 and XF16 on a tripod often meant it got rather wet. Well, quite wet. It really is a sensational combo and the close focusing ability of the XF16 (10cm) is rather useful in a country full of beautiful flowers and other majestic scenery.
Let's get to the burning question - XT-1 VS XT-10
At the time of purchasing the XT-10 there were great end of financial year sales going on and the lovely folks at DigiDirect offered me a killer deal on a second XT-1 rather than the XT-10 (think $100 price difference). Sure, it was tempting but I took the XT-10 instead. Why? As I said before, it's almost the same size as the X100 series (it's actually shorter) and when paired with the XF27 is only slightly deeper in size, which makes it 'pocketable' for me. I also liked some of the new features not present on the XT-1, most notably the full-auto switch that can be useful when handing over your camera to someone who doesn't know what to do, or when teaching a friend casually about composition or something similar. The buttons and dials also feel a bit firmer too, and the d-pad buttons are far more pronounced making it just a little better than the XT-1. Reality is, I simply didn't want a copy of another camera body that's going to sit in storage frequently. I wanted a different option when weather sealing wasn't required and when I wanted the tidiest and most discrete camera option.
The XT-10 performs just as well as the XT-1 on most fronts. Obviously it can't handle burst shooting anywhere near as good but I have found it to be adequate in JPEG only mode when shooting kids playing sports. I'll be honest in saying that I do miss the metering switch that sits atop the XT-1, since I do like to switch between 'average' and 'spot' metering a fair bit. Other than these points they're very similar cameras with enough subtle differences to warrant their individual existence and purpose.
Ireland is a truly magical country. Whether it's the rolling green hills and mountains, decaying ancient ruins along roadsides, or incredible calorie filled Irish breakfasts, it is always a welcoming and inspiring place. My wife and I can't thank the couple who made it all happen enough (wedding blog to come soon) and the wonderful people who took care of us, fed us, gave us beds to sleep in, and most importantly, took me to the pub. A truly hospitable and generous bunch! I can only hope it doesn't take us another life-time to get back there and explore it even further.
Metal - It's a huge part of my life and has been with me for the majority of it. It's been there during the good times, the bad times, the crazy times, and through many travels around the world.
The concept of jumping into a mosh pit (or whatever the kids call it now) let alone with a couple of grand's worth of camera gear isn't everyone's idea of a good time. For me though, in my limited live shooting experience, it's a place for capturing raw rhythmic energy, played by some of the most hard-working, talented, and genuine people on this planet.
What better place to run another Fuji XT-1 test?
A little background to these handsome figures that grace your screen. These are two top-notch metal/tech/death/thrash bands - Psycroptic and Goatwhore. Tip top names. I've not had the chance to hang out with the guys from Goatwhore, but the boys from Psycroptic are some of the nicest Aussies you'll ever meet and I'm lucky to call them friends. These guys put on a hell of a show and they're certainly not slugs on the stage. They move quickly and often unpredictably, thus giving you a heck of a set of circumstances for your camera and skills to be tested to the EXTREME!
Let's talk kit!
Most of my shots were done with the ever awesome XF56 1.2 strapped to my XT-1, with the occasional use of the XF18 F2, which I'm yet to return to the ever lovely Luis Ascui of www.mediaculture.com.au. I shot primarily at ISO 3200, F1.2, 1/180 sec for the higher production gig at HiFi Melbourne, and ISO priority at the smaller venue. I'll make sure you know what's what. All photos were shot as JPEGs with the Classic Chrome setting and exported in Lightroom using my usual tweaks and output at 55 quality.
I feel like I'm repeating what I've said in other blog posts about the XT-1 but here it goes.
Yet again, the XT-1 met my expectations and provided me with great image quality in some pretty unforgiving circumstances - low light, fast movement, and some less than desirable colours from the lighting rigs. That said, the same ugly issues reared their head - battery life and continuous focusing.
I'm consistently impressed by how well the XT-1 and XF56 focus in low light. They're a responsive combo that react quickly enough and make the mark at a rate I'm more than happy with. At times it will hunt, just like my Canon gear does and that can be worse than the XT-1, but after shooting a full wedding on it (blog to come soon), a number of live shows, a fair few low-light settings, and some fast acting Aussie fauna, it's a system I can rely on in most ways.
There's no denying the JPEGs that the XT-1 produces are great, particularly in high ISO settings. I love the Classic Chrome setting and I'm considering selling my X100S just to get it on the X100T, as well as Wi-Fi! There's an undeniable unique sharpness to the XT-1 and XF56 combo and I have received a lot of compliments from people since converting to it. I love what I've been able to produce in terms of colour tones from these live shots. There's none of that awful colour bleeding like on my Canon system at high ISOs and the noise is simply different on the Fuji's; far more pleasing to the eye.
About that battery life...
Well, there's no arguing it, the batteries for these cameras are somewhat frustrating to deal with. They don't last particularly long (~500-600 shots on a full charge) and I had one die suddenly on me at a peak point at a wedding (spare in pocket!) and was also a little too shutter happy on the way into this gig, which meant I didn't quite get the number of shots of the headline band that I wanted. I made the rookie mistake of not checking my spare on the way out and learned the hard way to always check. That said, these batteries are much smaller than traditional DSLR batteries and they're constantly powering an EVF. OH THAT GLORIOUS XT-1 EVF!
Edit 4 April, 2015: I have had a much better experience recently using the 18mm F2 and Continuous Focusing. Will post about it soon.
Typically when I'd shoot fast paced stuff on my Canon I would use continuous focusing mode, which works reliably and can handle sports and action stuff extremely well. I simply can't get along with continuous focusing mode on the XT-1, despite using all the tips and tricks out there. Single focus mode is pretty darn good though and I used this mode solely for these shots after getting immediately frustrated with it when I first tried using at this show.
Below are some shots of Psycroptic at a gig I found myself attending unexpectedly last minute. It was a tight space and featured very minimal lighting; certainly not to the same standard of the gig the week before. The XT-1 did struggle a bit more in this situation with focusing, simple as that. I had a lower keeper ratio than usual, which I attribute to there not being much fill-light on the guys as they played. I came mainly for the music this time around though and only had about 25 minutes to shoot, so keep that in mind when compared to 90 minutes from the prior show.
Minor apologies for this post being somewhat relaxed in its approach and relatively uninformative for the photography purists out there. I hope it serves as an example to others though of what this camera system can do and do exceptionally well.