Lens adapters and mirrorless cameras are certainly getting their fair share of exposure these days (mind the pun). Many Sony A-Series users can be seen sporting a variety of different brands of lenses on their mirrorless beasts, and of course Fuji have their M-Mount adapter for the X-series cameras. After looking into the various lenses folks were using on their mirrorless cameras I decided to purchase a cheap Canon EOS to Fuji X lens adapter and see what the hip rage is all about.
In case you're already looking at doing this based on the few quick snaps on here, this is the eBay link that I purchased my adapter from for ~$15 AUD. It's solid and does the job I expected admirably.
So why does this combo work so well on a mirrorless camera, particularly the XT-1, so well?
Firstly, Focus Peaking in manual mode with split screen focus makes it exceptionally easy to get focus on point. The XT-1 is well known for it's fantastic large Electronic View Finder (EVF) and it accommodates the split image exceptionally well. What's also great is that the cropped focus image changes according to the focal point you choose, which, combined with spot metering that matches the focal point, provides a set of features uncommon to most other systems.
The second point that makes the XT-1 and a lens adapter work so darn well is the electronic and mechanical shutter combo that allows it to max out at an incredible 1/32000 of a second. Basic lens adapters offer no electrical communication between the lens and camera meaning the lens is stuck at it's widest aperture. For typical DSLRs this makes using apertures like F1.4 difficult to use in broad daylight without the use of neutral density filters. This problem is easily overcome by the Fuji's electronic shutter, as demonstrated in the picture of the video surveillance camera
Another point to consider when using a lens adapter in these circumstances is how it changes the minimum focusing distance of full frame lenses. My Sigma 35mm was able to focus at ~15cm, which is only focuses to 40cm on my Canon 6D. Also, don't ever trust and Aussie giving you a spoon full of plain vegemite. You will die!
Focusing with the Sigma 35mm is a breeze. After shooting with fly-by-wire lenses like many of the native Fuji lenses for many months now, the Sigma was dead easy to get used to in manual mode and made me very conscious of exactly what I was focusing on, making sure it was on point. I was surprised at how easily I could focus on my neighbour's cats in poor light. I have not tested my Canon 135mm extensively, however it too was easy to focus with and having a 200mm equivalent focal length on my Fuji without having to dish out on a new lens is a greatly appreciated.
It's early days but I can definitely see adapting different lenses to my XT-1 as something to get addicted to. I've noticed too that manually focusing helps conserve the XT-1's battery-life since it's not dedicating power to the focusing mechanism in heavy duty glass beasts like the XF56. If you're sitting on the fence about trying this sort of rig out I suggest you get on over to my side and experience it.
There's no hiding the fact that I'm a big fan of FujiFilm and their current lineup of X-Trans mirrorless cameras. Between the X100S and the XT-1 they've become my shooters for 85-95% of assignments I undertake, leaving my Canon rig filling in when I need to shoot sports and flash photography. I'm sure that will change in the near future though once a solid flash system is available for Fuji users.
Looking back to only a few months ago, I scoured the web for posts about the XT-1 for weddings, low-light performance, concerts, and just general pointers about the system. With no local places offering the XT-1 for hire and having only limited in-store testing experiences with it, I decided to jump in and find out for myself. Since purchasing it I have tested just about every setting and style that I would typically shoot in and it has almost always surpassed my expectations. The ultimate test for me though was shooting the bulk of a wedding with only the XT-1 + XF56 & XF18 and the X100S. Did it pass? Or was it a stupid risk to shoot something as important as a wedding on a relatively new system that 'isn't pro'?
Before I go into further detail it's important to note that I had a second shooter on this wedding who shot with my Canon system (6D + Sigma 35mm & 135mm L) and took many incredible shots on a great camera system. I even ended up using it for part of the reception when I needed to use a flash since I haven't invested in a flash system for Fuji yet and the Yongnuo flash only works in manual on the Fuji Xt-1. My rig for the most part of the day consisted of the XT1 and XF56 slung over one shoulder and the X100s holstered using a knock-off version of the Spider Camera Holster, which for $5 performed without issue. You can see an integrated set of sample pictures from the day here.
Prior to the wedding festivities commencing I had my Fuji rig setup in silent mode - electronic shutter on the XT-1 and the super awesome leaf-shutter on the X100s. This allowed for complete discretion throughout the day and most importantly allowed me to move and shoot silently during the wedding ceremony. When you're in a space the has a lot of reverberation you very quickly notice the difference between a silent camera system and that of a typical DSLR shutter firing off nearby.
Switching between the XT1 and X100s was simple, easy, and effective, and I'm sure it contributed significantly in helping me not wear out at all across the 10 hour day and night. Well aware of the shortcomings of the batteries in the two cameras, I always had a spare full battery in my pocket, and thank the universe that I did because the first battery in the XT1 died on me just as the cake cutting was about to commence. Time to purchase the battery grip!
Aside from an instance of the XT-1's battery dying at an inopportune time, there was also one other peculiar instance where a dodgy eBay battery caused some pretty scary issues. We'd just finished shooting the main bridal party photos when the EVF on the XT-1 froze and flickered rapidly. The camera was effectively dead and I was devastated. I immediately took out the battery and let it cool down since I'd been firing off quite a few snaps on the cheap battery. I didn't have a backup XT-1 at the time so
I jumped across to my extra Canon gear and X100s for a while. Thankfully, with a new good quality battery and a bit of cool down time, the XT-1 came back to life and didn't skip a beat right through the reception. I have since tried to replicate the issue by firing off a hundreds of shots (more than this instance) in short succession but thankfully it hasn't happened again.
So what can be said about shooting with the XT-1 and X100s that hasn't been said in my previous blog posts? For one, people didn't think I was the primary or hired shooter for the wedding since my cameras were 'so small' and 'film like'. Do I have an issue with this? Certainly not, because if anything it made people more relaxed when I was present and let the moment be the moment. When I switched across to my 6D and flash combo the weight difference was tremendous and made me all the more grateful for the small form factor and mass of the XT-1 and X100s.
But the Fuji's aren't Full Frame!!! You can't be pro without Full Frame!!!
Go take a look at the wedding blog and tell me which pictures are Fuji and which ones are Canon.
I purchased the XT-1 shortly after Firmware 3.0 came out, which brought in a tonne of new features that I use frequently, such as: electronic shutter, 1/32000 max shutter speed, silent mode, AF point selection using the cross pad, and linked AF point and spot-metering. These were features that sealed the deal for me and the responsiveness of the XT-1's focusing system has been an absolute treat in low-light settings.
My next wedding is in the south west of Ireland and I plan to shoot the entire event on Fuji's with a Nissin i40 flash included. I have absolute faith that this rig will serve mine and my client's needs perfectly as a discrete, efficient, and professional photographic rig.
BONUS! Here are a few pics from Hayley and Dave's second pre-wedding shoot in an Australian bushland setting, all shot on the XT-1.
I'm about to make quite an about-face opinion on my experience with the XT-1 and its ability to be used in fast paced sports photography with continuous focusing mode engaged. For those who are familiar with my previous posts I have been quite critical of the XT-1's ability to function well in continuous mode with the XF56 1.2 for sports shooting. Upon reflection I have been really quite biased in my evaluation of that combination given the size of the lens, elements/glass involved, and the crazy F1.2 aperture I was shooting in for most shots. After shooting the same circumstances except with the XF18 instead I can see why I was setting very unrealistic expectations for the XT-1. Heck, how many Canon shooters out there use the 85mm 1.2 behemoth for sports shooting with such an insanely shallow depth of field? Not many if any.
As per usual, let's talk shooting specifications. For this bit of casual shooting I was using the XF18mm in Continous mode CH burst, set to ISO1600, varying the shutter between 1/200-1/500sec, and mixing the aperture up between F2.8-F4. These were all shot in JPEG normal with my beloved Chrome setting followed up with some quick tweaks of my own and some radial filters. For a tiny lens this thing produces some darn sharp images that have a beautiful 3D pop to them and awesome resolution that allows for some pretty heavy crops.
So in case you're a bit new to focal lengths, aperture, and their effect on depth of field (DoF), let's look at a comparison of the XF18 and the XF56 and the average aperture I was using on each occasion, and why the XF18 performed substantially better for very logical reasons.
XF18 @F2.8 at a subject distance of 8 feet = 8.23 feet of depth of field
XF56 @1.2 (because that's what you buy the lens for!) at a subject distance of 8 feet = 0.29 feet of depth of field
These two distinctively different levels of DoF explain a lot, particularly why I found continuous focusing mode to be so frustrating in the past. The XF18 didn't hunt around like the XF56 because it didn't have such a dramatically shallow DoF to work with so naturally continuous focusing mode is going to perform considerably better. That said, the XF56 did work well in single shooting mode and even if I shot at an aperture of F2.8 I'd only be getting a DoF of 0.69 of a foot = struggle town for focusing.
Something else that I found quite remarkable though when using the XF18, which probably has a lot to do with how much glass had to be moved around or rather not, is that with 619 photos on a single battery, the indicator hadn't even dropped to the less than 50% remaining mark!
Read that again!
619 photos on a single battery! And plenty more to spare.
After a solid browse through the 619 photos I took, I also noticed that the across bursts the XT-1 DID NOT miss focus mid shot. Amazing!
So why can't the Fuji perform well for sports shooting at wide apertures like my Canon 6D and 135mm F2?
The Canon 135mm F2 L has been my go to sports lens for a while now and was the first lens I owned on my 7D and continued to use on my 6D as well for various purposes. It's well documented that the 135mm F2 L is an exceptional fast focusing lens, and the most underrated piece of L series glass around, so naturally, comparing a Fuji XF56 lens to it is probably unfair. I know from experience that the 85mm 1.2 won't keep up with the Fuji though. I guess I'll just have to wait until the XF90 F2 arrives and see if it'll be the Canon killer!
My recent experiences with a borrowed XF18 lens (sorry Luis! I'll get it back ASAP!) have convinced me yet again that Fuji are making an exceptional product that meets all my needs as a photographer. The fact that I can walk around the streets with the XT-1 and XF18 inconspicuously yet use it to shoot close-quarter sports like Muay Thai, MMA, and BJJ demonstrates its versatility. It's truly hard to fault it as a camera system, particularly being able to use the EVF to get real-time exposure previews across different settings. I think it may be time to sell my X100s to fund a second body with my own XF18 lens or similarly wide lens.